The Oregon Natural Resources Report - Agricultural News from Oregon

Greg Walden issues challenge to AL Gore. Visit Oregon

April 28, 2009

Greg Walden to Al Gore: Come out to Oregon and see the condition of the forests
By Oregon Congressman Greg Walden
Press Release, 4/23/09


Majority leadership’s energy tax bill threatens to deal serious blow to Oregon’s biomass industry—and hopes for economic growth in rural forested Oregon

PRESS RELEASE BELOW

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Greg Walden today pressed Vice President Al Gore on the wisdom of not counting biomass from federal lands as a renewable energy in the major energy tax bill being pushed through Congress this spring.

The majority leadership’s draft of the bill mandates that 25 percent of the country’s energy must come from renewable sources by 2025. Obviously, those energy sources defined as “renewable” by the legislation will receive a major economic boost. For a reason that will not be explained by the majority leadership, biomass from federal forests is specifically omitted from the bill and will not be counted as renewable, unless the bill is amended.

“This legislation on page eight says woody biomass is not renewable if it comes off federal ground, period,” Walden told Vice President Gore. “On the Fremont-Winema National Forests, we have more than 200,000 acres of bug infested federal forestland. When that material comes out, why in the devil do we say it’s not renewable and can’t be turned into energy to reduce carbon emissions from coal?”

Not one panelist during four marathon hearing sessions on the bill has been able to answer Walden’s basic question: “What’s the science behind this decision to say biomass from federal lands is not a renewable energy source?”

Walden plans to offer amendments next week to improve many renewable energy provisions in the bill, but he will need bipartisan support to get it done.

In short, the majority leadership’s bill would undercut one of the remaining economic hopes in rural Oregon (Oregon is second only to Michigan in unemployment). The biomass energy industry in Oregon has investors on the sidelines waiting for a signal from the federal government that biomass energy—specifically from the enormous supplies on federal land—and the communities that would produce it in rural Oregon are a worthy investment.

This bill, if passed as currently written, would very likely have the effect of causing biomass projects to lose those potential investors.

In the Malheur National Forest there is a 28-year maintenance backlog on forest work, setting the table for an inevitable catastrophic wildfire. Meanwhile, the unemployment rates in the counties it covers, Grant and Harney counties, are a staggering 17.1 percent and 13.9 percent, respectively.

A 2005 Forest Service/Department of Energy report, commonly known as the “Billion Ton Report,” projects that there are over 1.3 billion dry tons per year of biomass potential—enough to produce biofuels sufficient to meet more than one-third of the nation’s current demand for transportation fuels by 2030.

Beyond the energy potential, there is the benefit biomass energy products present for the atmosphere. Wildfire in the United States annually spews into the atmosphere the equivalent of four to six percent of the country’s carbon dioxide emissions.

“Biomass energy production in our federal forests has the potential to prevent catastrophic wildfire, reduce global warming gasses released into the atmosphere, and put rural Oregonians back to work in areas where about one in five are currently in search of a job,” Walden said. “It needs to be a part of America’s smarter energy future.”

On Tuesday, he pressed Energy Secretary Steven Chu on the biomass issue. You can watch that here.

FACTS ABOUT THE ENERGY TAX BILL (“Cap and Tax”):
(source: House Republican Conference)

• Higher Energy Prices:  The bill imposes a national cap-and-tax regime that will tax every domestic energy producer for their carbon emissions—a tax which will inevitably be passed onto consumers.  Independent researchers, CBO, and the President all agree that this cost will be passed to consumers.  Furthermore, other provisions in the bill also increase the cost of energy, such as a new federal renewable electricity standard that will likely cause electricity prices to spike.
The energy plan amounts to a $646 billion tax that will hit every American family, small business, and family farm. Estimates are that family energy costs will rise on average by more than $3,100 a year. Those hardest hit by this massive tax will be the poor – who experts agree spend a greater portion of their income on energy consumption.

• Fewer Jobs:  The bill does little to address the enormous loss of jobs that will ensue when U.S. industries absorb the cost of the cap-and-tax plan and other provisions, likely sending millions of American jobs overseas.

The bill would be especially damaging in Oregon, which already has the second-highest unemployment rate in the country, by excluding federal biomass from the country’s renewable energy portfolio and dealing a severe blow to a very promising new industry in rural Oregon.

• More Government Intrusion:  The bill creates a host of new federal mandates on everything from outdoor light bulbs and table lamps to water dispensers, commercial hot food cabinets, and Jacuzzis.  The bill would also increase the demand for electricity (to fuel vehicles via new transportation mandates) at the same time as the other portions of the bill cause consumer electricity costs to spike.

Representative Greg Walden represents the Oregon’s Second Congressional District, which is comprised of 20 counties in eastern, southern, and central Oregon. He is a member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce and the ranking member of the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.

###

  
Print This Post Print This Post    Email This Post Email This Post

Discuss this article

Eli April 28, 2009

Finally we can have an honest debate on our forest.

Anonymous April 28, 2009

Sorry fella, there will be no debate. People have given up the public square in favor of debating in court. Who cares about public opinion and representative government anyways?

felled April 28, 2009

I see that George Bush and Bill Clinton will be in a debate, so why not Walden-Gore. Keep it friendly, focused and it would be great. Get out the popcorn.

Dave April 28, 2009

Good job Greg!

Jimmy7 April 28, 2009

Will Gore see the forests for the trees?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please answer the following question to confirm that you are a real person: *

Natural Resource Headlines



Top Business News

 

Top Natural Resource News

 

Top Faith News

 

Copyright © 2018, OregonReport. All Rights Reserved. | Terms of Use - Copyright - Legal Policy | Contact Oregon Report

--> --> -->