The Oregon Natural Resources Report - Agricultural News from Oregon

Water Rights Lawsuit Targets Secret Water Negotiations

December 11, 2009

Water for Life Files Lawsuit Challenging Secret Water Right Negotiations
By Helen Moore,
Water for Life,

(Salem, OR)  – Water for Life and a half-dozen individual irrigators have filed suit against the Oregon Water Resources Department and its Director for denying public access to the Tribal water rights negotiations surrounding the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement in violation of Oregon law (ORS 539.310 et seq.).

The lawsuit, filed in Marion County Circuit Court, seeks to enjoin the Oregon Water Resources Department from continuing to engage in closed-door water right negotiations with the Klamath Tribes and other parties. The lawsuit also seeks to enjoin the Department from finalizing the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement without providing public notice of negotiations and opportunity for interested parties to participate and file exceptions to the agreement as Oregon law requires. The primary statute on which Water for Life’s lawsuit is based, ORS 539.310(1), provides as follows:

(1) The Water Resources Director may negotiate with representatives of any federally recognized Indian tribe that may have a federal reserved water right claim in Oregon and representatives of the federal government as trustee for the federally recognized Indian tribe to define the scope and attributes of rights to water claimed by the federally recognized Indian tribe to satisfy tribal rights under treaty between the United States and the tribes of Oregon. All negotiations in which the director participates under this section shall be open to the public.
(2) During negotiations conducted under subsection (1) of this section, the director shall:
(a) Provide public notice of the negotiations;
(b) Allow for public input through the director; and
(c) Provide regular reports on the progress of the negotiations to interested members of the public.

The negotiations surrounding the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement have taken place under a shroud of secrecy enforced by a written confidentiality agreement. All parties to the negotiations, including the Oregon Water Resources Department, have signed the confidentiality agreement. Water for Life and other plaintiffs say it is this aspect of the negotiations that violates the law.

“Oregon law is very clear,” said Water for Life spokesman, Richard Kosesan. “The Department has legal authority to participate in Tribal water right negotiations, but the negotiations must be open to the public.”

The Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement, which has yet to be finalized, is contingent on the removal of several dams, and contemplates agreed upon limitations to Tribal water claims that will ensure irrigators on the Klamath Project receive a certain amount of water. The agreement is made possible, in part, by provisions calling for the retirement of 30,000 acre-feet of water in the Upper Klamath Basin. Yet even though the agreement depends on the retirement of Upper Basin water rights, the Oregon Water Resources Department and other parties to the closed-door negotiations have repeatedly denied Upper Klamath Basin irrigators and the public access to the negotiating table.

“It is easy to reach agreement when the parties that will be forced to sacrifice are not allowed a seat at the negotiating table,” said Chad Rabe, an Upper Klamath Basin irrigator and plaintiff in the case.

While Water for Life and other plaintiffs want to protect Upper Basin irrigators who have been specifically denied access to the negotiations, they say the lawsuit is about something even more fundamental. “Water is a public resource and the state agency responsible for managing that public resource should not be participating in negotiations concerning that public resource behind closed doors,” said Ambrose McAuliffe, one of the plaintiffs in the case.

Chad Rabe, went even further stating, “Open government is one of the fundamental concepts on which our country is based. It is reprehensible that a lawsuit is necessary to force public officials to conduct the public’s business publicly.” Said Rabe, “The average Oregonian may not care a whole lot about Tribal water right negotiations in the Klamath Basin, but history suggests that every Oregonian has reason to care about transparency in government. Our right to open government is what is at stake and Oregonians should be supporting Water for Life’s legal efforts and watching this case closely.”

* Media Contact: Richard Kosesan, Water for Life (503) 370-7024

  
Print This Post Print This Post    Email This Post Email This Post

Discuss this article

Marvin McConoughey December 11, 2009

Negotiating in public is difficult but essential if we are to enjoy public confidence in those who claim to represent the public and, in this case, the tribes. Oregon government pays considerable lip service to open records and open government. The reality falls sadly short of the rhetoric.

Ridenbaugh Press/Water Rights » OR: Another Klamath suit December 13, 2009

[…] From a release: […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please answer the following question to confirm that you are a real person: *

Natural Resource Headlines



Top Business News

 

Top Women's News

 

Top Natural Resource News

 

Top Faith News

 

Copyright © 2017, OregonReport. All Rights Reserved. | Terms of Use - Copyright - Legal Policy | Contact Oregon Report

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Natural Resource Report through weekly email updates:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

RSS Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)