March 16, 2010
March 16, 2010
Ag Groups File Amicus Brief on High Court’s First Biotech Case
National Wheat Growers Association,
NAWG joined a coalition of agricultural organizations Monday in filing a joint friend-of-the-court brief to the Supreme Court in support of the petitioners in Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed Farms. The case will be the first on genetically modified crops that the Court has heard and will examine if a lower court acted hastily and incorrectly by banning the cultivation of biotech alfalfa despite extensive scientific evidence documenting the safety of the crop.
In their brief, the groups urge that the lower courts’ decision to approve an injunction without adequately hearing the key evidence must be reversed “to protect the farmers who choose to grow genetically-engineered crops, as well as the public benefits that agricultural biotechnology brings to producers and consumers around the world.”
In the lower court case, environmental groups and individual organic alfalfa farmers sued USDA, claiming the Department’s decision to grant deregulated status to glyphosate-tolerant, or Roundup Ready, alfalfa violated the National Environmental Policy Act.
The courts in the Ninth Circuit determined that USDA should have conducted an environmental impact statement (EIS) before it decided to deregulate, and the court ultimately enjoined almost all planting and sale of Roundup Ready alfalfa pending the issuance of the EIS.
According to the ag groups’ brief, the lower court’s injunction against biotech alfalfa, was made without the court conducting a thorough review of evidence that precluded a finding of irreparable harm. In 2005, USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) concluded that there is no significant impact on the human environment due to granting non-regulated status to Roundup Ready alfalfa. Following the lower court’s ruling, APHIS completed a 1,400-page document as its draft EIS, and again has recommended that Roundup Ready alfalfa be deregulated and that farmers be allowed to grow it.
The brief also explains that the lower courts failed to consider the public benefits of agricultural biotechnology, which is widely used in the U.S. in crops including corn, soybeans, cotton and sugar beets. There is no commercialized biotech wheat anywhere in the world, but NAWG believes biotechnology’s introduction into the wheat crop is necessary for the wheat industry to increase productivity, attract acres back to the crop and feed a growing global population in a sustainable way.
Of the more than 10,000 cases appealed to the Supreme Court each year, only about 1 percent is accepted for review, and the agricultural community is closely watching to see which what the Court’s action on this one. The case is scheduled for oral argument on April 27 with a decision expected by June.
The brief was submitted by NAWG, American Farm Bureau Federation, Biotechnology Industry Organization, American Seed Trade Association, American Soybean Association, National Alfalfa and Forage Alliance, National Cotton Council and National Potato Council.
Print This Post
Email This Post
Copyright © 2010, OregonReport. All Rights Reserved. | Terms of Use - Copyright - Legal Policy | Contact Oregon Report
‘Extensive scientific evidence documenting the safety of the crop’
Interpreted: studies paid for by Monsanto to allow them to market a crop whose biological and environmental impact is impossible to fully ascertain until after the damage is done. Bees pollinate alfalfa, which makes it much harder to control the spread of than wind pollinated crops. Bees forage up to six miles. This would virtually eliminate the ability to produce organic (by law non-gmo) alfalfa…the main forage of organic milk producing cattle and other organic meat-producing animals.
We better pay attention to what Monsanto is cramming down our throats in the name of profit and monopoly or we will wake up to a nightmare 10 or 20 years from now. There is plenty of proof out there that gmo products are causing a host of health problems.
How many years did we swallow all the studies that showed tobacco wasn’t harmful? Currently we are going along with the cell phone cover-up even though more and more cell phone users are showing up with tumors. I am the child of pregnancy drug experimentation in the 50’s. Most of my peers are in mental institutions, committed suicide or have severe mental problems. This is known because the scientific community kept track of us all through our lives to see what the result of their experiments would be. Luckily there were enough early negative results to end the program.
We can’t keep turning a blind eye to dangerous new technology just to make a buck…its criminal and ignorant behavior. People have to come first…not profit.