The Oregon Natural Resources Report - Agricultural News from Oregon

Back the Renewable Fuel Standard

April 5, 2018

By Kraig Hoene
Lebanon, Oregon

The debate surrounding the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) has intensified and become much more complex recently. The efforts of a handful of oil refineries to portray the RFS as an unfair law to their bottom lines has attracted political opportunists like Sen. Ted Cruz to fight on their side. In times like these, when the opposition ramps up considerably, we must reflect on how lucky we are to have great biofuel champions in industry, congress and the White House and encourage them to keep up the fight. An eastern coast oil refiner’s downfall was the perfect opportunity for oil lobbyists and Sen. Cruz to exploit.

Sen. Cruz has campaigned for months to reform the RIN system and has held the confirmation of Bill Northey to his U.S. Department of Agriculture position hostage until he got what he wanted. He argued on behalf of the oil industry, who only want to see the RFS weakened and their control of the pump strengthened. If their plans ever came into fruition, it would come at the cost of farmers’ already seeing declining incomes and hard-working employees at over 200 biorefineries across the country.

Thankfully, Senators Chuck Grassley and Joni Ernst have been there every step of the way to combat these attacks. At a biofuels meeting in the White House last week, they represented farmers and biorefinery workers everywhere in defending the RFS and seeing that Northey was finally confirmed to his USDA position, where he’ll join the Iowan Senators’ fight to promote American biofuels. With more biofuel meetings with President Trump on the horizon, it’s now more critical than ever that our leaders in congress know that this is exactly the kind of farm-friendly, pro-biofuels work we wished of them when we cast our vote for President Trump.

Print This Post Print This Post    Email This Post Email This Post

Discuss this article

Bob Clark April 5, 2018

Renewable Fuel Standard should go; but it’s a pure subsidy/mandate designed to make this artificially induced industry profitable (an entrenched Farm subsidy now). It’s pretty marginal as an environmental program, it’s debatable there’s much if any savings on CO2 emissions. And geez, who doesn’t like stopping more often at the gasoline station because ethanol burns faster than regular conventional gasoline (about a third faster).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please answer the following question to confirm that you are a real person: *

Natural Resource Headlines

Top Business News


Top Natural Resource News


Top Faith News


Copyright © 2019, OregonReport. All Rights Reserved. | Terms of Use - Copyright - Legal Policy | Contact Oregon Report

--> --> -->